<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In Search of the Grand Unified Data Model</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stuartsierra.com/2008/02/08/in-search-of-the-grand-unified-data-model/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stuartsierra.com/2008/02/08/in-search-of-the-grand-unified-data-model</link>
	<description>From programming to everything else</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 21:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymouse</title>
		<link>http://stuartsierra.com/2008/02/08/in-search-of-the-grand-unified-data-model#comment-30205</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 20:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuartsierra.com/2008/02/08/in-search-of-the-grand-unified-data-model#comment-30205</guid>
		<description>Take a look at PostgreSQL. It has built-in full-text search (integrated as of v8.3) with word stemming, weighted indexes, and all that. But since it's a first-class part of the DBMS, it supports transactions, partial indexes, and other fun stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take a look at PostgreSQL. It has built-in full-text search (integrated as of v8.3) with word stemming, weighted indexes, and all that. But since it&#8217;s a first-class part of the DBMS, it supports transactions, partial indexes, and other fun stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart</title>
		<link>http://stuartsierra.com/2008/02/08/in-search-of-the-grand-unified-data-model#comment-24170</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 16:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuartsierra.com/2008/02/08/in-search-of-the-grand-unified-data-model#comment-24170</guid>
		<description>Jan Says: &lt;em&gt;I would encourage you to take a closer look at CouchDB.&lt;/em&gt;

Thanks Jan.  I have looked again -- I really like the document-oriented model and the ability to store binary attachments.  I'm waiting for 1) &lt;a href="http://groups.google.com/group/couchdb/browse_frm/thread/e9674621076b93db/83a58d051b4b0406" rel="nofollow"&gt;completed Lucene integration&lt;/a&gt;, and 2) breaking the &lt;a href="http://groups.google.com/group/couchdb/browse_frm/thread/22473d0cbe985077/f8099f02da2a2321" rel="nofollow"&gt;2 GB limit&lt;/a&gt;.  Then CouchDB will really be perfect for my needs.  But until then, Solr is a finished product that provides similar advantages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jan Says: <em>I would encourage you to take a closer look at CouchDB.</em></p>
<p>Thanks Jan.  I have looked again &#8212; I really like the document-oriented model and the ability to store binary attachments.  I&#8217;m waiting for 1) <a href="http://groups.google.com/group/couchdb/browse_frm/thread/e9674621076b93db/83a58d051b4b0406" rel="nofollow">completed Lucene integration</a>, and 2) breaking the <a href="http://groups.google.com/group/couchdb/browse_frm/thread/22473d0cbe985077/f8099f02da2a2321" rel="nofollow">2 GB limit</a>.  Then CouchDB will really be perfect for my needs.  But until then, Solr is a finished product that provides similar advantages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan</title>
		<link>http://stuartsierra.com/2008/02/08/in-search-of-the-grand-unified-data-model#comment-23867</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 08:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuartsierra.com/2008/02/08/in-search-of-the-grand-unified-data-model#comment-23867</guid>
		<description>I would encourage you to take a closer look at CouchDB. Despite the ongoing development, a lot of things work quite well. If you need assistance in any form, check out the Google Group or the Freenet #couchdb channel on IRC.

Cheers,
Jan
--</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would encourage you to take a closer look at CouchDB. Despite the ongoing development, a lot of things work quite well. If you need assistance in any form, check out the Google Group or the Freenet #couchdb channel on IRC.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Jan<br />
&#8211;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
