Comments on: The Virtues of Static Typing http://stuartsierra.com/2007/07/23/the-virtues-of-static-typing From programming to everything else Sat, 11 Oct 2008 00:52:54 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: Stuart http://stuartsierra.com/2007/07/23/the-virtues-of-static-typing#comment-15169 Stuart Mon, 23 Jul 2007 16:50:37 +0000 http://stuartsierra.com/2007/07/23/the-virtues-of-static-typing#comment-15169 Arto Bendiken Says: <em>"You could also look into languages like Haskell and O’Caml..."</em> I've been interested in Haskell and O'Caml for a while, just need to find time to study them... Arto Bendiken Says: “You could also look into languages like Haskell and O’Caml…”

I’ve been interested in Haskell and O’Caml for a while, just need to find time to study them…

]]> By: Arto Bendiken http://stuartsierra.com/2007/07/23/the-virtues-of-static-typing#comment-15168 Arto Bendiken Mon, 23 Jul 2007 16:45:29 +0000 http://stuartsierra.com/2007/07/23/the-virtues-of-static-typing#comment-15168 You could also look into languages like Haskell and O'Caml, which have static typing but still manage to provide many of the benefits of dynamically-typed languages. I tend to try and call C++ and its ilk manifestly-typed to avoid Haskell zealots reminding me that not all static typing sucks as badly... You could also look into languages like Haskell and O’Caml, which have static typing but still manage to provide many of the benefits of dynamically-typed languages. I tend to try and call C++ and its ilk manifestly-typed to avoid Haskell zealots reminding me that not all static typing sucks as badly…

]]>