Comments on: Ruby More Memory-Efficient than Lisp? http://stuartsierra.com/2006/11/15/ruby-more-memory-efficient-than-lisp From programming to everything else Mon, 13 Oct 2008 15:30:32 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: Isaac Gouy http://stuartsierra.com/2006/11/15/ruby-more-memory-efficient-than-lisp#comment-1974 Isaac Gouy Fri, 01 Dec 2006 20:13:50 +0000 http://stuartsierra.com/2006/11/15/ruby-more-memory-efficient-than-lisp#comment-1974 (Take this with a pinch of salt, I don't know anything about Lisp.) Remember the basic sbcl.core image (not runtime) we use is about 22MB, I expect knowledgeable Lisp programmers could reduce that before deployment. We've made no attempt to slim down that Lisp memory image. (Take this with a pinch of salt, I don’t know anything about Lisp.)

Remember the basic sbcl.core image (not runtime) we use is about 22MB, I expect knowledgeable Lisp programmers could reduce that before deployment.

We’ve made no attempt to slim down that Lisp memory image.

]]>